Sunday, February 17, 2013

Two Cases – Reflections of Reality



While reading the case study entitled “Susie Wong”, I began reflecting about my experiences as an employee. I met a lot of “Susie Wong” in the workplace, and honestly, I became like “Susie Wong” in the past. I have learned how to deal with this type of situation. I have made the best solution, as well as the best decision from this experience.

Truly, it is a great advantage to take a Master’s Degree which focuses on management, specially taking the course “Human Capital Management” which unlocks and reveals what’s going on in the management side; on how the management assess an employee, and what are the considerations of promoting  an employee in the company.

The case of Susie Wong emphasized the importance of Emotional Intelligence in the workplace. No doubt, Susie Wong has impressive credentials, an MBA degree, and a 2nd placer in the CPA licensure examination, what else can you asks for an employee.  Susie Wong has high levels of IQ, and unfortunately a low EQ. Studies have shown that EQ is more important than IQ. Emotional Intelligence is really what you need to succeed in work, as well as in life. Susie Wong has an attitude problem. She can easily discourage when there’s a problem within her team. She has a superiority complex, and she think that she is more effective than her manager, and anybody else. She is impatient and always bad tempered in the team causing her not to gain respect from her peers. She always compares her experiences in the current company with her past employer.

Emotional Intelligence
The story of Susie Wong reminds me of the film “Hanggang Kailan Kita Mamahalin” which starred Richard Gomez and Lorna Tolentino. This is a story of a couple who are both employed in the same company. Lisa (Lorna Tolentino) has shown exceptional skills in promoting the product lines of the company. She has a very good leadership and management skills that’s why the top management have decided to promote her, and become a Product Manager. On the other hand, Mike (Richard Gomez) is an opposite of Lisa, he is always irritated; he even treated her subordinates like slaves. He lacks professionalism, and he even shout in the workplace whenever he is disappointed. He felt dishearten when he knew that his wife has been promoted, and become his own manager. Because of feeling of resentment, he confronted a board member asking why he was not considered in the position, since he has been in the company for almost 10 years. His superior said “We haven’t considered you in the position by which you are not able to handle, and also because of your bad attitude.” Mike became frustrated, inefficient to his work, have decided to leave the company, and have started his own fishing business, and unfortunately, it was unsuccessful. The relationship with his wife was affected, because he envies Lisa for being successful.

Emotional intelligence (EI) is the ability to identify, assess, and control the emotions of oneself, of others, and of groups. It has five components: self-awareness, self-regulation, social skill, empathy, and motivation.

Self-Awareness means, “Having a deep understanding of one’s emotions, strengths, weaknesses, needs, and drives”. People who have a high level of self-awareness are very honest with themselves and others. They avoid the extremes of being overly critical and unrealistically hopeful. Furthermore, these people know how their feelings affect them, others, and their job performance.

Self-Regulation involves controlling or redirecting one's disruptive emotions and impulses and adapting to changing circumstances. People with a high degree of self-regulation are more capable of facing the ambiguities of an advancing industry than those whose degree of self-regulation is low. Furthermore, people with a high level of self-regulation can help to enhance the integrity of an organization by not making bad decisions through impulse behaviors. Self-regulation will help individuals stay in control of their feelings and make thoughtful decisions.

Social skill refers to managing relationships to move people in the desired direction. Individuals use their friendliness in order to have people do what they want. Social leaders are able to build a rapport easily by finding some type of common ground with everyone, thus establishing a broad circle of acquaintances. In addition, the social individual is an effective persuader and is able to manage teams effectively.

Empathy is considering other people's feelings especially when making decisions. The empathetic person combines employees’ feelings and other factors in order to make decisions. There are three reasons why empathy is important to leadership in today’s business world: “the increasing use of teams, the rapid pace of globalization, and the growing need to retain talent”. When using teams, empathetic individuals can be astounding leaders because of their abilities to recognize and understand other opinions. Empathetic leaders play a key role when globalization is a factor, because they can understand the importance of others’ cultural differences. Empathetic individuals are also effective in retaining talent because they are able to develop personal rapport with new employees or protégés during coaching and mentoring stages.

Motivation refers to being driven to achieve for the sake of achievement. Motivation makes people restless; therefore, they continuously explore new horizons to find better ways of doing their jobs. Highly motivated people constantly raise their performance expectations for themselves, their team, and their organization.

The story of “The Bone of Contention” is ubiquitous in workplace. Bella is a CPA, and an effective employee, and been working in the Food Corporation for the past three years. And then, Patty is a newcomer but has lot of experiences from different industries. The case shows the comparison between loyalty and experience. I believe Patty has a great advantage over Bella in terms of skills that she acquired from different companies. The behavior of Bella, being depressed and demotivated, is unjustifiable.  She should not act that way, and made Patty felt limited. If she’s not contented on what she’s getting then, she must resign in the company, and look for the better opportunity. Another problem that has been identified is the confidentiality of the salary information in the company. The employee’s compensation and benefits information must be secure, and should be treated with high confidentiality.

These two stories reflect a reality, and truly happening in the workplace. It helps me to identify and evaluate different types of human behavior in an organization.

“The man of character, sensitive to the meaning of what he is doing, will know how to discover the ethical paths in the maze of possible behavior.” – Earl Warren -

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Knowledge is Power



Is knowledge really a power? Yes, of course, Knowledge is power. Every time I heard the term “knowledge” I always remember the late weather newscaster in ABS-CBN Channel 2 named “Ernie Baron”, also known as “The Walking Encyclopedia”.  He regularly says “Kung Walang Knowledge, Walang Power”. After he’s done reporting the current weather condition in the Philippines, he shares trivia to the audience, like about the history, animals, inventions, or famous places.  His trivia are very interesting, and every trivia that he present was like an “AHA!” moment for me.  I may say that this segment in TV Patrol is one of my favorite.

Knowledge is Power
Knowledge is a familiarity with someone or something, which can include facts, information, descriptions, or skills acquired through experience and education. It can refer to the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. Knowledge is the product of information which is originally came from data. Knowledge combined with experience will become wisdom. Wisdom is an applied knowledge. It is a deep understanding and realization of people, things, events or situations, resulting in the ability to apply perceptions, judgments and actions in keeping with this understanding.

In the Holy Bible, King Solomon was noted as being one of the wisest men that ever lived.  Instead of asking for long life or riches or the life of his enemies, he asked for an understanding mind to govern his people that he may discern between good and evil. The true wisdom that came from Solomon was his prayer to God asking for an understanding mind. Solomon asked for knowledge and God gave it to him. God gave Solomon wisdom and very great insight, and a breadth of understanding as measureless as the sand on the seashore. 

King Solomon

Solomon's wisdom was more his glory than his wealth. He had largeness of heart, for the heart is often put for the powers of the mind. He had the gift of utterance, as well as wisdom. It is very desirable, that those who have large gifts of any kind should have large hearts to use them for the good of others.

Some employees in an organization are self-centered; they do not want to share their knowledge with their colleagues. The reason is that they are afraid to lose their job, and be replaced by that person. This thinking is really pisses me off. Honestly, I met a lot of this type of person from my previous company, and IBM. They don’t like to delegate work to the members of the team. These people are insecure in thinking that the other person will be much greater or effective than him. If an employee doesn’t want to delegate his work, well, there’s no reason for him to get promoted. And I know this is true, especially in IBM, and the organization doesn’t tolerate this attitude because one of the IBM Competencies is to “Help IBMers Succeed”.

Knowledge is an intangible asset of the organization. It is a capability that needs to be managed and nurtured. Knowledge and ideas are meant to be shared and not be kept. As a person, you must be an instrument and become bread for others. Through sharing our expertise and extending our help to our colleagues builds strong relationship, and increases the team’s competence and performance.

“The idea that knowledge can be slotted into a data-to-wisdom hierarchy is bogus, for the simple reason that one man's knowledge is another man's data.” - Thomas A. Stewart, (2000) –